On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:18:53 +0100 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well putting the eapi per tree/repo and provide a way to fetch > directly the tree a package manager can understand sounds pretty much > a simpler alternative.
And it defeats the whole point of having EAPI at all. > Add that basically much of the discussion is founded on uncertain > basis since there isn't a document about what exactly eapi is > supposed to be, nor other details that you considered compulsory to > get a clue about what's being discussed, so there isn't quite a way > to say what's good and what isn't beside polling who is hacking > package managers about alternatives and have an idea of what the dev > base likes better if there are equivalent solutions. Then don't say anything. Leave the discussion to those who know what the whole thing is about. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
