Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:59:53 +0000 > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It's so that the ebuild's EAPI can be extracted. The way things are >>> currently, there is no way to get an ebuild's EAPI without already >>> knowing its EAPI. >>> >> Like I said, it's trivial to extract a line from the ebuild without >> sourcing. You know it is, and so does everyone else. > > Note *the way things are currently*. If you think this is untrue, > provide an algorithm that will correctly give the EAPI of any current > or future ebuild given that ebuild's filename (hint: you can't).
Simple. Whatever you'd like to have in the suffix, we can put it on the first line of the ebuild. Just go and get it, and that's the EAPI. -- Zhang Le, Robert GPG key ID: 1E4E2973 Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
