On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:11:16 -0800 "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in > > parallel? Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends > > after the ebuild process has terminated? Discuss. > > If the pm implements read/write locking on the underlying datastore > (which it should probably have regardless of this request) then I > don't see a problem in parallel has_version calls.
Actually, it's the communication channel that's the issue... If, for example, has_version is implemented in terms of a request on a pipe rather than execing a new package manager, we get into messy bash locking territory... > I don't get your second example..do you mean the ebuild is running > has_version in the background and then terminating? Yeah. Again, consider the pipe example. If the package manager closes off the pipe when it thinks the ebuild's done, calling has_version will get the backgrounded process SIGPIPEd. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
