Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to
unless they had a block in place ...
When you move a package over an another the files don't change. So Portage thinks you have libdca installed but the files are from libdts. So every depending on libdca would have to have their atoms in such a way that doesn't match libdts existing versions. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thank you, now I see. And if I understood correctly to fix atoms you
just have to add >=media-libs/libdca-0.0.5 into DEPEND of packages which
depend only on libdca. After this package move will work as it should.
Did I miss anything?

This requirement would always have to be used and people writing ebuilds a year from now aren't very likely to know about the move history so it's better not to use package moves for situations like this.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to