Petteri Räty wrote: > Alin Năstac kirjoitti: >> Petteri Räty wrote: >>> Benedikt Morbach kirjoitti: >>>> >>>> In my humble opinion it would be nice to have a greater degree of >>>> control by separating this into two useflags, sqlite2 and sqlite3, >>>> just like e.g. qt3 and qt4 >>>> >>> >>> Probably. Even better would be to get rid of sqlite2 but that >>> probably doesn't happen any time soon. >> >> I understood this will be the case, so I removed sqlite2 support from >> mail-filter/dspam even though it could support both versions. >> > > If a program supports both then go with sqlite3. The things is that > there are sqlite2 only things left. I don't have much interest in > sqlite2. > > If a program supports only sqlite2, shouldn't "sqlite? ( =dev-db/sqlite-2* )" be used as dependency atom?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature