On Wednesday, 13. February 2008 19:34:37 Mark Loeser wrote: > Okay, so I stand corrected about them approving it. Where is the > approved specification though?
That's something I asked the council, too, here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.council/110 I got no response from the council on the list. Thus, I asked during the next council meeting's "open floor" session: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20071213-summary.txt The last paragraph of the summary shows the (non-)result. > PMS is still a draft the last time I heard, Well, considering that the approval refers to PMS, some version of it seems to be authoritative. :-) I just don't know which one (and, as can be seen from the full log of said meeting, I consider the external PMS repository authoritative until a council decision) and git+ssh://<username>@git.gentoo.org/var/gitroot/pms which was once the "official" copy of the repository doesn't seem to exist anymore. > and if it isn't, we should have a non-moving version that is > authoritive about EAPI=1. (And no, the man pages are not a > specification, nor is a list of bugs...give us one document that we can > point to) Totally agreed. -- Best regards, Wulf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
