On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:46:33AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:40:46 -0700 > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i dont particularly care about -r0, i'm just stating that banning > > > _alpha0/etc... is not acceptable. > > > > Lay out your reasons please; the meaning doesn't differ (same version > > due to implicit 0 after all) > > But the PV does.
PV varying first of all, isn't incredibly grand from where I'm sitting- yet more any versionator style code has to account for. Second, so what? We're talking about 15 ebuilds here. It's not as though the ebuilds are completely screwed in this- dealing with the PV change for the ebuild is pretty minor. ~harring
pgpYxtwxhqVeV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
