Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : > On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing > > arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things optional > > for other to reuse (like xfce) but afaik no other "keyring" like > > programs are optional deps of another package in portage. Let's not cast > > a simple change into breakage for users already using it (even in > > stable, and yes I'm lazy :D). > > Lazy is the word. > I cannot argue with this one, I just know that it won't be the gnome > herd who do the work when the time come to fix this (resolve > conflict). > The gnome herd will re-introduce the lazy ticket, and make other herd > use yet another confusing USE flag. > This is not the right way to maintain long term constants.
failure, you tried to argue ;) > You asked for objections... You got some. > > You can leave this local USE flag, and stay with generic term. > Or you can rename it when it goes global so it have proper name. > You can also ignore this and force gnome onto all users. Seriously though, when I find stuff to fix, I try to fix it. I just don't see anything to fix right now. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
