On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that
>  does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done
>  in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple
>  kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please
>  consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not
>  roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can.

tar-1.20 has lzma support, so maybe it could handle this too, once it
goes into stable
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to