On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:21:24 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that everything these days is an EAPI scope change. That's
> not very useful for Gentoo, considering it's been quite some time
> since PMS was proposed and we've not seen approval for either EAPI=0
> or EAPI=1 (or PMS, for that matter). What we have gotten is a
> half-assed "you can use EAPI=1 in the tree to get these enumerated
> features" from the Council, but that's nothing like acceptance of a
> spec. Perhaps if you spent a little more time doing something more
> constructive than being an asshat on the lists, PMS would have been
> approved long ago. Of course, that doesn't mesh well with your
> apparent need to be a complete dick to people, so continue on with
> the status quo.
+1
Kind regards,
JeR
--
[email protected] mailing list
