On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What GLEP 55 fails to address right now is the very development process > it is seemingly supposed to alleviate. It addresses the issue of EAPI > implementation from the viewpoint of the package manager's developer, > but it doesn't begin to address the viewpoint of the package > maintainer or architecture developer at all. It looks to me like a lot > of problems are moved out of the package manager(s) and into this > already huge tree of files, with different EAPI-suffixed files > addressing different problems, and that indicate be a non-trivial > increase in the number of files in the tree - files which would > address the equal purpose of installing exactly one =cat/pkg-ver.
GLEP 55 says: "Note that it is still not permitted to have more than one ebuild with equal category, package name, and version." > In other words, disregarding its other real world deficiencies like an > immediate goal, GLEP 55 fails to describe a keywording policy for > architecture developers Keywording policy wouldn't change. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
