On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:39:00 +0200 Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > > all, > > > > I'm at the point that -Wl,-O1 appears to be successful. It's time > > to toss on -Wl,--hash-style=gnu. The issue is that we need glibc > > 2.5 or higher and not mips. So one solution is to put the following: > > > > default/linux: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu" > > default/linux/mips: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1" > > > > However, this means we'll have to put a has_version check in > > profile.bashrc of default/linux, which seems a bit cludgy.. > > > > Any suggestions? Comments? Also >sys-devel/binutils-2.17. > I'm just wondering... unless it has changed since last time I > installed Gentoo Linux, but isn't the installation manual on purpose > conservative with CFLAGS? make.conf.example also does not much more > than "-march -O2 -pipe". -O1 to the linker feels conservative to > me. Still, do we really need to go any further? Why not make > additional pointers to possible values for LDFLAGS like we do for > C(XX)FLAGS in the installation manual? +1. The default is already to generate a GNU style hash when available. I really don't know why we need to screw with it further. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
