-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joe Peterson wrote: > I'm not sure the "EBUILD_" in "EBUILD_FLAGS" would be necessary > (redundant?). Maybe even "OPTIONS" or "PROPERTIES" makes more sense. > In fact, "FLAGS" might be a little too generic, even? Worth a short > discussion.
I think something like "PROPERTIES" or "ATTRIBUTES" would be nice. Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiWNvgACgkQ/ejvha5XGaML/QCgj7Aof1UEVGrtBNcloDjFMhDJ izEAn2FTGTnnDa23XEF3ZENc9UaQU0P4 =JrMC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
