On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:03:02 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining > new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and > hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose > that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed > property definition and they would also be able to write in one or > more alternative names for the definition. I don't know what the > best method(s) to carry out a vote like this would be. Does anybody > have any suggestions?
What's wrong with just discussing it until we agree? Why do you think a compromise is necessary? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
