Zac Medico wrote:
> Does package.keywords seem like a good solution for the types of
> problems it's meant to solve? Would anybody like to discuss any
> alternative approaches?

I think it's a good and easy solution to the problem(s) solar described
in #55321. But as Marius [1] said this can become quite confusing very
quickly, therefore we would need to  limit it's usage to
uclibc/hardened/$special sub-profiles imho. Otherwise it gets more of a
pain in the ass.

  Tobias

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55321#c11

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to