Zac Medico wrote: > Does package.keywords seem like a good solution for the types of > problems it's meant to solve? Would anybody like to discuss any > alternative approaches?
I think it's a good and easy solution to the problem(s) solar described in #55321. But as Marius [1] said this can become quite confusing very quickly, therefore we would need to limit it's usage to uclibc/hardened/$special sub-profiles imho. Otherwise it gets more of a pain in the ass. Tobias [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55321#c11
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil