-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [...] > The benefit is that it's a logically separate action, and will avoid > all the silliness of people repeatedly changing their minds about > which phase should do the eautoreconf calls and so on.
a) Is this really an issue for maintainers? b) Does it really matter? c) So the flow will look like: ... src_unpack src_prepare src_configure src_compile ... To me this seems like an unnecessary overgeneralisation. The *only* potential "benefit" I see here is that at some point of time in the nebulous future, it might be possible to tell the PM to always skip src_prepare in order to give a system where everything is "vanilla". This is not something I see as being useful to us. - -- Arun -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkirCm0ACgkQ+Vqt1inD4uyTvQCgjEPHRCJUFrIsoyk5EnYb/jNC Lu8An0KTbHP59UXa4UcShSC7VwLUgQpI =zwPv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
