Ryan Hill wrote:
On the other hand, it also seems completely ridiculous from a practical POV to have to wait 30 days (and waste arch team resources) to fix an incorrect licence on a stable package.
And have everyone recompile the package, thus wasting cpu cycles and users' time.
I would have to imagine that if upstream changed the license that the old installation would be covered by the old license. What do binary distributions do if an upstream changes the license? ;) Or are we talking about dev error here?
-Jeremy
