-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Leverton wrote: > 2008/9/5 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler >> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name. > > But is it so much simpler as to justify adding a special > gitweb-specific hack to the package managers?
Well, it's not much different from the existing file extension logic that's already built into the unpack function. I think what really matters is whether or not the majority of people see it as a useful extension. - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjA4iMACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOPxwCfWolOw1zC+VbgrGrFQXqRwoXn vDoAoOLGL+PXhyCb2+cmAI4INLfO9reS =TXwO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
