On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:46:55 +0200 <large snip> > What's the scope of the changes? I think it'd be easiest to discuss > this if you posted an informal summary describing the differences in > terms of which bits of PMS are affected.
Ciaran, others: In a way I feel like we (the Prefix project) are mis-using the EAPI value. If we have something that is designed to work with *any* EAPI, is it really a special EAPI? haubi said something on the gentoo-alt list that made me think about this more: "When an usecase of something is orthogonal to what that thing is designed for, one should consider using a different thing for this usecase." -source unknown Is this PROPERTIES-like information? Is that easily supportable in the PM?