On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:30:09 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to
> > ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with
> > 4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near
> > future if at all possible.  Stabilizing this version is going to be
> > a huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to
> > implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned
> > up in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our
> > sanity would be greatly appreciated.
>  Is there a bug that is blocked by such stabilisation requests?  We
> had such a thing on the GCC 4 transition (apart from the normal
> porting tracker) and was really handy.  I will rebuild three x86
> systems (one totally stable, two mostly) to check.

There is now:

Thanks for the help. :)

gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to