Petteri Räty demis ki::
> Michael Hammer wrote:
>> * Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 00:46]: 
>>> What are others feelings on this?  
>> I like the idea!
>>> What issues do you see with having a wiki?  
>> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
>>> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a
>>> wiki?
>> We should develop some kind of review process and at least the
>> possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases
>> the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed
>> section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the
>> infos provided have a minimum of quality.
>> g, mueli
> We already have a reviewed section. It's called GDP.
> Regards,
> Petteri

The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.

Gokdeniz Karadag

Reply via email to