On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:25 -0600 Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:54:38 +0000 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:51:11 +0100 > > Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > 2. (with myeclass.eclass containing EAPI=2) > > > > ----- > > > > EAPI=1 > > > > inherit myeclass > > > > > > Invalid > > > > QA violation, but legal and a pain in the ass. > > I didn't think it was a brainy thing to do, but I can't find anything > saying it isn't allowed. It probably shouldn't be. Ah now i did. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
