On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:24:26 -0400
Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote:
> >
> >> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
> >> versions than ${PV}.
> >> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
> >
> > And multiply number and total size of files in ${FILESDIR}?
> >
> Or just rename it ${PN}-bar.patch instead of ${P}-bar.patch if it is a
> patch for more than one ebuild version.

And when the patch has to be changed?  ${PN}-foo-2.patch?

The PV in the patch name indicates what version the patch was made
for.  This can be useful info, if just for judging how bad you are at
sending patches upstream. ;)

gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to