On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:14:36 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:10:50 +0200 > Peter Alfredsen <loki_...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > A reasonable default would be --disable-static. Then libs that have > > in-tree consumers of their static libs could then make a use-flag, > > users who need them could use EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-static". > > If you're going to do that, why not do it as an EAPI thing? This has > the added bonus that there's a clean migration path... If we ever decide to do that, eapi would be a sane way to do it. Right now, we're only discussing making static libs configurable. The other bits we can deal with when we come to them. /loki_val
