Arun Raghavan wrote: > The fonts license seems to be the same as licenses/BitstreamVera which > is in-tree. > One of them, yes. But the two others fonts license are more difficult to get. > As for the songs, does it make sense to put that in a separate package > that the code package depends on? The package can have the restrictive > license it is distributed under and RESTRICT="mirror bindist". > Yes, I can do a fretsonfire package and a fretsonfire-data package like nwn. It makes sense for licensing but it will force us to mirror self-splitted packages. But even if doing that, what will be the LICENSE for fretsonfire-data ? "Distribution, modification or commercial usage of the songs is not allowed" is not really a license ;) (and I will have to add the 3 fonts license with 2 unknown)
By the way, I have contacted upstream about this issue and I didn't get any answer. For information, copying file is here : http://dev.gentoo.org/~volkmar/fretsonfire_copying.txt Thanks, Mounir
