Luca Barbato <[email protected]> posted [email protected], excerpted below, on Mon, 11 May 2009 15:28:52 +0200:
> I'm not sure if would be better have QEMU_TARGETS or separated > USER_TARGETS and SOFTMMU_TARGETS. Namespace pollution? QEMU_USER_TARGETS and QEMU_SOFTMMU_TARGETS, maybe? Other than that, no preference. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
