On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:15:28 -0500 Jeremy Olexa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM, David Leverton > <[email protected]> wrote: > > yourself, "shell-like". "printf -v EAPI 1" is perfectly valid > > shell (at least if we decide to allow bash 3.1 features), and has > > the same effect > > To stir things up: > Who decides this? There are more and more bash-3.1 features in the > tree and I brought it up to the Council months ago becase the PMS says > that only bash-3.0 is allowed but no one cares.
Can't allow newer bash features in global scope until the whole "can't make global scope changes" thing is sorted out. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
