Sven <[email protected]> posted [email protected], excerpted below, on Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:29 +0000:
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan <at> cox.net> writes: >> FWIW, that'd not be a portage issue per se, but an EAPI issue, since it > > I see, very interesting! Sounds like a lengthy process, but never mind. > Do you know where EAPI changes are discussed? (Google and the Bugtracker > didn't yield a useful reply.) Here? (See the current GLEP55 thread, among others.) Also the council list and meetings, since they must approve EAPIs before they are allowed in the tree. Also see the various PMS (package management spec) threads, and the app-doc/pms package, for the current EAPI documentation. From the package metadata, the homepage is: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/pms.xml -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
