On Sunday 17 May 2009 20:39:26 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, 17 May 2009, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > >> > >> 2009/5/17 Piotr Jaroszyñski <pe...@gentoo.org>: > >>> 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously) > >>> 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change > >>> 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild and one-time extension > >>> change > > > > I'm strongly against 1 and 2 (no need to repeat the old arguments > > here), but I could live with 3. > > I also prefer 3. > > >> My preference goes to 3 with a .eb extension and EAPI on the first line. > > > > Make this "the first non-empty non-comment line". > > As others have commented, we should probably make this the last comment > line in the header. Any suggestions for a specific identification string > or do we simply use '# EAPI="X"' or use a she-bang '#!/<..> EAPI="X"' ? Yeah, this sounds pretty reasonable to me :)
-- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sound/Sunrise] Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
