QT doesn't work well when mixed versions of its core libraries are installed. Usually an emerge -avDu world solves the problem, but some users tend to avoid this.
For example, lets say you have parts of QT 4.4.2 on your system. QT 4.5.1 is available and a user decides to manually update qt-core, or to install KDE which has a QT dependency on a QT library not installed. In these cases, portage will update only a part of the installed QT libraries, leaving the system in a mixed state. QT based apps don't like that. Others will refuse to build, others will fail to run. We've managed to experimentally block partial QT upgrades by adding an RDEPEND to all QT libraries [1] in qting-edge overlay. Portage understands this and throws out B blocks if you try to change versions only in parts of QT, but upgrades/downgrades fine if you do them all at once (or use -Du world). This "fix" also catches stale QT libraries that nothing depends on anymore because the user has removed whatever required them (and never ran --depclean). Unfortunately we've got reports from paludis users stating that they can't update QT from qting-edge anymore. What I'd like to discuss is the following: 1) Is there a saner way to achieve our goal of doing whatever is possible to avoid mixed QT versions? 2) Is our implementation considered correct and acceptable by the PMS guys? 3) Whats the general Gentoo Policy on mixed versions? Do we care, or is our policy "please -Du world"? We've also managed to achieve the same thing by adding PDEPENDs to each QT library for any other QT libraries that depend on it: i.e. if qt-xmlpatterns depends on qt-gui, we add the following to qt-gui: PDEPEND=" || ( !x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns ~x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-${PV} ) " the above (expanded for all libraries) has the same effect as the [1] RDEPEND but looks a bit more hackish. thanks [1] lines 30-59 http://github.com/gentoo-qt/qting-edge/blob/master/eclass/qt4-build-edge.eclass -- Alex Alexander || wired Gentoo QT && KDE Herd Tester http://www.linuxized.com