-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2009.05.28 19:36, Alec Warner wrote: [snip] > > The community could of course just deny the features that require > glep55 (no bash4, no global scope changes, etc..) I guess the > community is doing that by default anyway by repeated discussing this > glep and not implementing anything. > > > [snip]
GLEP55 is not in a fit state to be approved. Its a technical paper submitted to this list for peer review. As many have pointed out, as a technical paper. it lacks quantified, objective discussion of the problem and the various solutions it touches on. - -- Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoe3vkACgkQTE4/y7nJvatqXQCfR70cUj06JN4bOFuccihREE6x J18Ani/YQ5jSLql6X3uff27FHfkrZFgp =J2CX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
