-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Freeman wrote: > Steven J Long wrote: >> Getting into a nonsensical debate about PN being metadata seems to be >> the level of the argument, so forgive me for not being very impressed. >> (It's externally derived and in fact the whole point of the product; >> unless someone is proposing losing PN and PV from filename, can we >> *please* dismiss that argument as the irrelevance which it is?) >> > > Without actually intending to open a new debate on that issue <cringes>, > I'm actually a fan of NOT obtaining PN and PV from the filename. I've > seen an approach like this used in various systems and I happen to like it:
In which systems did you see this approach? Marijn - -- If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say. Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkomU8YACgkQp/VmCx0OL2ym0QCfcbruFkqtUIBhdwhKIjaP9qol Qi8An0TdECGv14pgMTmjdDhllvGylM7y =1iV1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
