On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 21:28 +0100, Mike Auty wrote: > but I thought I should ask what > the best course of action would be here?
If it were my ebuild, I would not add the updates under the new, draconic license and either fork the GPL'd code or mask the package for removal. You can not in any way guarantee that a Gentoo user is non-commercial. Especially the patch clause would make ebuilds unsustainable. As you say the author personally, perhaps there is a sense of reason that you could appeal to. > Thanks, > Mike 5:) Regards. Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
