On Saturday 22 of August 2009 01:06:30 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:01:48 +0200 > > Maciej Mrozowski <reave...@poczta.fm> wrote: > > That being said I don't like refraining from "return value approach" > > towards "exception handling approach" > > nonfatal's not an exception handling approach. Think of it as a utility > like 'nice', 'ionice', 'xargs', 'env' or 'hilite'.
Le sigh..
Replacing return value with die ("throw") *and* providing 'nonfatal' as
mechanism to catch and ignore what's been thrown is obviously "exception
handling approach" (not literally that is, I don't have to recall the
semantics of \" character) - every respected software engineer will see that.
But on topic, if you want to participate in discussion, please refer to
suggestions given by David, please.
--
regards
MM
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
