Dne pondělí 21 Září 2009 18:03:56 Torsten Veller napsal(a):
> * Tomáš Chvátal <scarab...@gentoo.org>:
> > I think it is not required
> > EXPF="src_compile src_test src_install" <- definition, also nulls
> > anything what was in it before :]
> > case ${EAPI:-0} in
> > 2) EXPF="${EXPF} src_configure" ;;
> > 1|0) ;;
> > *) die "Unknown EAPI, Bug eclass maintainers." ;;
> > esac
> > EXPORT_FUNCTIONS ${EXPF} <- export
>
> And later in cmake-utils_src_compile you use:
> | has src_configure ${EXPF} || cmake-utils_src_configure
>
> What will happen if an EAPI=2 ebuild inherits cmake-utils and another
> eclass also using EXPF that does not EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_configure and
> the ebuild uses cmake-utils_src_compile?
>
> It will call cmake-utils_src_configure during src_configure and later in
> cmake-utils_src_compile it will run cmake-utils_src_configure again,
> won't it?
>
You dont do this magic before inherits, so you are safe, if you inherit in
middle of your eclass code, then you probably deserve the breakage for
writting such horrible thing ;]A - inherit B EXPF - value from B A - define our own export_functions EXPF - value from A
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
