Victor Ostorga <[email protected]> said: > Lately I have stepeed into bug 216461 "init systems in sys-apps as well > as in sys-process and even app-admin" and was about to moving > sys-process/minit to sys/apps-minit , but stepped into bug 190982 > "move sys-process/{minit,runit} and app-admin/jinit to sys-aps" which > is the same and closed WONTFIX in 2009-08-09 . > > I don't know the history about init systems category, but obviously is > necessary to stablish a category into which init systems should live > happy forever (sys-init ? app-init? foobar?). >
i would stick all inits into sys-process - its not crowded in there and "process" fits the init concept well IMHO. generally i thought, we wanted to move stuff out of sys-apps, as its really not a good description of what a package is about. sys-apps/ucspi-tcp and sys-apps/ucspi-ssl could move to net-misc or preferably net-libs. sys-apps/ucspi-proxy to net-proxy. thanks kind regards Thilo > Regards, > > Víctor. >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
