2010/1/17 Christian Faulhammer <[email protected]>:
> Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]>:
>  As much as you love to have the new and shiny VDB2, it is far off.
> Prototyping and drafting implementations would be great to have some
> base where we can discuss on (in a civil manner).  So having this
> timestamp would be a good way to prepare a sane migration path.

No, it wouldn't. Brian's proposal a) would be of no use whatsoever for
VDB2 migration, and b) would not be used by VDB2. Having a *decent*
cache validation mechanism is a good idea; having a half-baked one is
a waste of time.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Reply via email to