On Sunday 17 January 2010 17:12:27 Thilo Bangert wrote: > Sebastian Pipping [snip] said: > [snip] > > > i chose maintainer-wanted to indicate that co-maintainers and > > non-maintainer-bumps are welcome. what valid means can i use to send > > such a message, instead? > > i dont know of any. i generally assume all packages are looking for more > maintainers, but that assumption may be as invalid as yours (having > [email protected] as <maintainer> in metadata.xml to indicate > the above).
ive seen people use a <description> tag in their maintainer tag with basically "feel free to make changes to this" -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
