On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:02:05 +0100 as excerpted: > >> Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis <aslani...@gmail.com>: >>> I would prefer to keep the keyword for Bugday Members to administer. >> >> I don't think that sending mails would work well. If you want extra >> control/QA for bugday team members I would propose two different >> keywords: one for bugday candidates and one for confirmed bugday bugs. >> >> Any dev could mark bugs as candidates easily and without delays while >> you could still reserve acknoledgement to you. > > ... And here I'm proposing three: > > BUGDAY (nomination) > BUGDAY-ACCEPTED (or whatever is thought appropriate) > NOBUGDAY (or BUGDAY-DECLINED, or BUGDAY-REFUSED, or...)
I think the last one is over-engineering a bit; bugzilla keywords are not permanent so this will likely not help as much as one may think in practice. Old bugday keywords are visible in the activity trail. -A > > The latter would be for nominated bugs that were declined as inappropriate > for whatever reason, to help prevent them being nominated again. > Presumably there'd be a comment added explaining why as well, but the > keyword would be what shows up in someone's face if they're thinking about > keywording it BUGDAY. > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman > > >
