On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600 Nathan Zachary <nathanzach...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump > > > > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their > > maintainers in Gentoo. > > > > > > Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday > > on the third Saturday of the month? First bumpday could be March 20th, > > 10 days from now. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > > Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently > doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the > status of the tree. Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as well. > > --Nathan Zachary The ones that I'm CCed on, either as proxy maintainer or because I have some other interest, I prolly would mind. They're not simple revbumps, but they have dependency changes and/or other complicated changes, which is the only reason why they're still open. My bugs can't be solved with a simple rename-and-commit. I'm prolly not the only one who feels this way, so you really need to pick your bugs carefully! Otherwise we'll end up with another screwed-up mess like the one we just went through with patrick. Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays.
Description: PGP signature