On 12/03/10 17:17, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 12-03-2010 08:46:34 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >> That said they were perfectly entitled to make the decision of not >> wanting to maintain qt3 any longer. The only advice I can give is that >> all disgruntled users and developers create a qt3 project and >> adopt/unmask/re-commit the qt3 libraries for maintainers of packages >> who need it. I doubt this will happen as this could have been done a >> long time ago, but it's never too late. > > Didn't we have a graveyard thing/overlay somewhere some day? Some users > might happily prefer to use stuff that's treecleaned, or removed due > security issues. If removal of stuff would mean it's dumped in there it > can be easily used by users and more easily readded later afterwards, if > need arises. > >
As we have the "overlay depend on overlay" support now, we could easily put those packages into the sci overlay, if there would be a qt3 support/lib overlay.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
