On 4/3/10 12:03 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote: > On 04/03/10 10:50, Petteri Räty wrote: >> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just >> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a >> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about >> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 >> >> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says: >> "We will not hide problems" > > Sounds good, can we at the same time get RESOLVED OBSOLETE (for bugs that are > not valid anymore due to changed situation, RESOLVED INVALID isn't applicable > in > this case as it implies the bug is and was invalid from the begining).
Wouldn't WORKSFORME apply in that case? Just renaming the resolutions doesn't gain us much. Reducing the number of possible resolutions does, I'd say.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
