On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:13:41 +0200
Christian Faulhammer <fa...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org>:
> > I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it
> > just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
> > different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
> > disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:
> > 
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21
> > 
> > Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract
> > says: "We will not hide problems"
>  Kill REMIND and LATER, introduce Later keyword or ASSIGNED LATER.

"Me too."©

What happens to bugs already in that state though?

fonts,                                            by design, by neglect
gcc-porting,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to