On 12/04/2010 14:22, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse<george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like
litigation when trying to protect it's logo.
I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if
perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light.
There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise
Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a
A simple warning should suffice:
"While the Gentoo community takes a large amount of care to keep the
wiki's information correct, problems like deprecation of features,
misinformed users and vandalism can and will always be a problem with
the wiki format. If you see a problem please feel free to fix it, notify
a member of the developer team or send an email to w...@gentoo.org"
Also adding a notice like "Gentoo takes no responsibility for when you
b0rk your box by setting the wrong CTARGET" somewhere would be good.
Those two should cover all the bases.