On 13-04-2010 18:12, Matti Bickel wrote: > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> From my PoV, editing ChangeLog is like editing history. Complete no-no. > > It is possible in all major SCMs for a reason. And I (as a user) would > laugh at Changelog entries saying "um, I got that bug number wrong, it > is really #1234". If I (as a developer) log such edits, I'm wasting my > users time. > > So I'll continue to edit and commit Changelogs without additional notice. > Can't we just create a commit hook that appends the bug summary as a comment if a #XXXXX bug string is present on the commit log?
Something like: - - Foobar commit Description bl a bla bla # bug 1234: Show summary for those that don't double check the bug # number. # # Other git crap that usually appears at end of log # ... - -
