* Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> schrieb: > I wonder if that case shouldn't be handled better with an huge ewarn so > people concerned would really run it in a benchmark environment, alone.
ewarns should be circumvented (make it work w/o them), IMHO. I can imagine I'm not the only person who doenst want to keep an close eye on each single build/merge. In this concrete example, the package's build system is misdesigned. They shouldn't rely on runtime benchmarks for build time decisions in the first place - this is unpredictable. But this is not an issues distros should have to cope with. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
