On Tuesday 25 May 2010 22:58:43 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:24:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 May 2010 02:02:01 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has
> > > reached 170 unassigned bugs...
> >
> > people dont seem to realize that bug-wranglers isnt just for
> > re-assigning to the proper maintainer. they are supposed to be doing
> > basic triage, user feedback, as well as cleaning up the bug. i
> > shouldnt be seeing bugs assigned to maintainers that have
> > "${PN}-1.ebuild" as their subject, nor bugs that lack basic things
> > like `emerge --info` or build logs.
>
> Without looking at the rest of this whole thread, that's lucky lucky
> wishful thinking. It doesn't match reality. Hope you're OK with that.reality matches what i said. bug wranglers *are supposed to be*. if reality matched what i wanted, then i wouldnt have written an e-mail of "supposed to be" and "shouldnt be" statements. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
