* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto <[email protected]> schrieb: > just because you decided to "offer" some service, it in no way "forces > us" to accept it.
No, it does not. I never claimed that. And so really I dont understand that fundamentalistic kind of argumentation (which is really near to ranting). > With your proposal, you're expecting us (distro maintainers) to put our > trust and our users safety in you and your service - what made you think > we would or should do it? Not at all, please refer to my other answer (some minutes earlier). > >> Well, Gentoo is short of manpower ? hmm, perhaps some should think > >> about why so many folks are resigning and so few fresh coming in > >> (at least according to this lists traffic) ;-O > > This type of argument when you're trying to convince others to use your > service is in the least a disservice to your purpose. That particular argument is not about the OSS-QM project, but the general social climate @Gentoo. Actually, when talking to collegues, most of them share this. The most commonly used term I've heared from them about Gentoo devs is "total lack of social competence". (to be fair: this also applies to lots of other OSS projects). cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: [email protected] mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------
