Hi Markos, I'm very busy in real life, but I'll try to solve all squid issues this week. Btw, [2] and [3] were solved from net-proxy's perspective and [1] wasn't fixed by upstream AFAIK.
Cheers, Alin On 04/08/2010 13:50, Markos Chandras wrote: > Hi there > > net-proxy/squid needs your love. Bug #311927 and Bug #304751 require a > version bump. Our user community did an excellent job there providing an > improved ebuild for that. Furthermore there are several open security > bugs wrt squid [1][2][3][4]. net-proxy herd what is your status? > Security bugs should be your first priority. If you are unable to > maintain certain packages you could ask for help instead of staying > quiet. Maybe we should list this > package as maintainer-needed and request some proxy-maintainers from our > user community. What do you think about that? > > @Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every > single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are > active and which are dead > > @QA: Should step up and commit these ebuilds just to get > rid of the security bugs which, frankly, don't look that good ( distro > wise ). I know technically is not our job, but we need to step up here > and either fix the security bugs since net-proxy can't do that, or mask > this package which is a no-go. > > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/261208 > [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279379 > [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279380 > [4] http://bugs.gentoo.org/301828 >
