On 08/08/2010 03:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:15:04PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: >> >> Why not just set some LDFLAGS that totally won't work (-Wl, taters) >> and then assume anything that actually compiles with those flags set >> does not respect LDFLAGS. Set that up on a tinderbox instead of >> making users do it. >> >> -A > Alec > > I was only talking about the *dev* profiles. As I said this will help > *developers* to track this problem and fix it before they commit their > packages to tree. Tinderbox will only catch packages that are already in the > tree. The main goal here is to fix these packages before they reach it >
I suggest making the dev profiles just pull in a binutils version that automatically enables the support (excluding profiles where binutils is not used). Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
